Friday, June 23, 2006
Contributors
Previous Posts
- Bush 43, Bush 41, Watergate, Iraq ... Like Father ...
- Confronting the B.S. of "Cut and Run" Nice to se...
- A Sober Deconstruction of "Cut and Run" "Last wee...
- One Step Forward On Holding Bush Accountable For D...
- Adultery - The New Republican Family Value "Three ...
- Bush Ordered Torture Of Mentally Ill Man To Avoid ...
- Immune From The Standard Of Bush Ethics? "Rove tes...
- Do-It-Yourself Impeachment "Impeach for Peace, a M...
- One Down, A Whole Bushel To Go ... "A former Bush ...
- "No Comment" From Fitzgerald Spokesperson On Rove ...
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
2 Comments:
Who wanted war? Who profited from that war?
Then ask again, who was behind the forgery?
I agree totally.
Although I'll admit that this sounds as stupid as "the documents were forged but the cause was just" or whatever excuse CBS used to try and wiggle out of RATHERGATE (news flash - with Dan Rather leaving CBS the network plans to rename them selves "C" since they dropped the "BS"), the simple fact is despite whatever spin you put on the Niger documents (for instance, what if the documents were DELIBERATELY made to look like forgeries so they could be denied if ever revealed?) it is well documented and agreed by all that Saddam always had nuclear intentions, much like Iran now and he was only biding his time until sanctions were eased to ramp up his efforts.
You are so blinded by your hatred of all things Bush (easy to get that way, he's done a lot to be pissed about, and I'm not talking about Iraq at all) but the point is when you get emotional you make mistakes yourself. I'd be a lot more willing to hear your point of view if it wasn't so emotionally charged.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home