Saturday, June 17, 2006

How To Impeach A President

Keep your eyes out for the National Teach-In on impeachment, launching nationwide on July 19.

Friday, June 16, 2006

It's All About the Messages

“...it is beyond my comprehension how a reasonable observer could believe anything but the fact that the Iraq war has made the U.S. less safe.” - Alex Rossmiller

Rossmiller makes some insightful observations in his opening comments at YearlyKos (see link from Thursday below), but when he says: “Despite what the media might say, Democrats largely agree on foreign policy,” and “I do not believe that Democratic values and strategies in foreign policy need to be significantly revised. I also do not believe that we should have huge message problems,” it gets me worried. The part about not having message problems is really worrying, actually.

Currently John Kerry is talking about full troop withdrawal by the end of ’06, Hillary Clinton is touting her own withdrawal plan and schedule, and Howard Dean and other Democrats chime in from time to time with generalities about the Bush admin having no plan in Iraq. So what is the message we are receiving from Democrats?

The press and Republicans will chew up and spit out any perceived inconsistencies within the Democrat “consensus,” especially when it comes to Iraq. Two examples: CNN attempts to highlight this trend while interviewing Nancy Pelosi, but luckily Wolf was shooting from the hip and Pelosi caught him doing it. Karl Rove has begun peppering his speeches with the mini-slogans that will eventually form the core of his all out attack on Democrat inconsistencies: in this case it’s the Democrat plan to “cut and run” from Iraq. We haven't heard the last of this one, and how exactly will Democrats respond to this in a credible, comprehendable manner to the public?

This is nothing new. Exploiting the lack of cohesive messages and weak communication skills of the Democrats got Bush 2 terms in the WH and Republicans a majority in congress. Republicans know their audience, keep the messages simple, and repeat them incessantly.

So how do we take what Rossmiller says about Democrat foreign policy and package that up in a digestible, compelling message for the public? This is the challenge for Democrats. If there was one thing we SHOULD have learned in 2000 and 2004 is that messages drive perception, and perception drives voting. The public likes the media to lob easy-to-comprehend ideas and messages at them. By using the term “reasonable observer,” Rossmiller assumes that the audience is indeed not only reasonable, but immune to the false realities conjured up by Republican messages. He is giving them (the public) too much credit.

Democrats can’t repeat the mistake of overestimating the American public’s propensity to comprehend reality. It is precisely what the media says that matters in the end, no matter how cohesive the Democrats think they are.

So Democrats: please take a weekend, get out of DC for some group hugging and get your shit together. What can happen between now and November? Anything.

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

"Fighting Off Fatigue"
I've looked this over, and thought about it from a few angles, and just have to put the question out there: Was the President on speed - or some other special energizing agent - during the press conference this morning?  Or is it just that he's been drunk and/or hung over in public for the last six years?  Just watch the video ... about two minutes in whatever he's on starts to kick in.  About 12-1/2 minutes in, during the Q&A, the difference really shows.

Who was the quack that used to travel with Kennedy to keep his drugs flowing?  Anybody know whether Dubya has similar special medical advisors?  

Sorry folks, but I'm just not buying that his performance this morning was unassisted.  Contrast videos like this one, if you don't see the difference right away.  And take a look at Steve Watson's work from last year chronicling the Bush public persona meltdown, if you weren't aware that there was a problem that needed fixin'.

Any pharmaceutical experts out there have ideas on what magic pill(s) might produce a performance like this morning's?
Resistance Takes Courage:
Kids like Ava Lowery are the future of a progressive America.  You can see why the Bush administration wants to crush her and her peers under the weight of staggering debt, international hatred and a failed health care system.

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

Latest On (Sealed) Rove Indictment?:
"We believe that federal criminal indictment "06 cr 128" (Sealed vs. Sealed) is directly related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation. That's based on a single credible source and the information discussed above. We believe that Karl Rove is cooperating with federal investigators, and for that reason Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald is not willing to comment on his status. That is based, again, on a single credible source, and background information provided by experts in federal criminal law. We believe that the indictment was returned and filed "on May 10 2006." Same single credible source, and details from the filing records."

Meanwhile, Rove's lawyers saying he will not be charged ...

So if the Turdblossom isn't indicted in "Sealed vs. Sealed", then who is? Any ideas?

Monday, June 12, 2006

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Weeks Not Months:
"George W. Bush said on Friday that Iran has 'weeks not months' to respond to a U.S.-backed offer aimed at containing Iran's nuclear ambitions and said Tehran needs to suspend uranium enrichment.  Bush said if Iran does not suspend enrichment, 'there must be a consequence' ..."

Don't you just love it when the shrub talks cowboy tough?  Um ... come to think of it, things tend not to go so well when he does that.

Here's an idea ... how about somebody stop him before he does any more harm.  Do we have a Congress, or a Judiciary, or anything that might stop a moonbat messianic dry drunk president from destroying the country with one military adventure after another?  Anyone?